in Search
Welcome to Neopoleon - Sign in | Join | Help
Navigation: Home | Forums | Galleries

Star Wars Episode III - The only review you will ever need

When I was a wee lass, I had some Legos. Unlike my rich little friends, I didn’t have very many, and it forced me to be very particular about how I chose to allocate Lego resources to any given project.

Where my rich friends could empty their five buckets of Legos on the ground and get to work building a hideous castle-spaceship-dinosaur thing, I had to make do with a much smaller assortment of bricks. My creations, although not as large or flashy, had a lot more class to them.

When George Lucas was a wee lass, he had some money. Unlike his rich little friends, though, he didn’t have a lot, and he had to be very careful about only implementing his stronger ideas.

Where his rich friends could pour bajillions of dollars into a project, George had to make do with a much smaller pile of cash. His creations wound up being a combination of innovative special effects and some halfway-decent stories.

Years later, I have enough money to buy myself huge assloads of Legos, and George has enough money to create whatever movies he’d like.

The difference is that, years later, I still have some taste.

A long time ago…

Copies of George Lucas’s original Star Wars script have been floating around the internet for years. Even before the web, you could find it out on USENET. It was even sitting in the file repositories of a few BBS’s.

I downloaded the thing back when I was in college.

It was terrible. Worse than terrible, actually. It was stream of consciousness sci-fi fantasy, and it made almost no sense. Some elements of it were entertaining and showed promise, but taken as a whole, it was a steaming pile of tauntaun poop.

There were too many ideas; too many things happening all at once, and which could never, ever, ever, ever be created on screen.

At least not back in 1973 when the script was written.

A few years ago...

George Lucas has too much money. He also has too much power, too much influence, and too much access to Hollywood. He could get up any day of the week, phone somebody down at 20th Century Fox, and say “I think I’m going to write, direct, and produce a movie about Nazi child porn,” and they’d let him do it. They’d give him funding. There would be Burger King tie-ins. And so on.

So, they gave him the green light on the new Star Wars series. And why not? He had a good track record with the first series, the work he did on Indiana Jones, and the Ewok Adventures. Plus, he was going to be pulling the dough out of his own pocket. All they had to do was get out of his way and let him work his magic.

Can’t blame them, of course. There was no way for them to know what would happen.

Last night…

I took Aydika and my friend Felix to see this celluloid disaster last night. Felix and I had gone to see the first two films when they were released. We were a good team because we had similar expectations, and we were able to act as a small, isolated support group for each other after the credits ran.

Last night, though, we were prepared. Having absolutely no faith in the new franchise, our expectations were low. Instead of working overtime to erect real-time mental scaffolding to support the crappy ideas in the movie, we both let ourselves go to simply experience the movie as it was.

Things got off to a bad start. The opening crawl was, unfortunately, hilarious. Seeing the name “Count Dooku” presented in the context of describing some major galactic threat is comedy gold. That name is totally inoffensive. George might as well have named him “Count Poopypants.”

And things didn’t improve much.

There’s a light at the end of the tunnel, but it’s pretty dim, as though the tunnel-flashlight battery needed some recharging.

The first hour and a half: lame story and pointless dialogue…

Don’t expect much excitement. The first ninety minutes or so are meant to do two (2) things: 

1. Set us up for the end of the trilogy

2. Make ninety minutes go by

The majority of the movie could have been squeezed down to about forty minutes without losing anything. Many scenes were redundant, echoing something that might have happened fifteen minutes prior, while others simply didn’t make any sense in relation to the story (the pointless trip to the wookie home-world, for example).

There’s a lot of “dialogue” between Anakin and Padme that goes like this:

Anakin: I think you’re so beautiful.

Padme: No – you are.

Anakin: No, seriously, baby. You’re hot.

Padme: Oh, Annie.

Anakin: I love you.

Padme: No, I love you.

Anakin: For reals, though, I think you’re so awesome.

Padme: You’re so nice.

Anakin: Obi-Wan is a dickhead.

Padme: Really?

Anakin: Totally.

Padme: No way!

Anakin: Way.

Padme: Wow. I love you.

Anakin: I totally love you more.

[lather, rinse, repeat]

You’ve probably heard about the dialogue, and it’s every bit as bad as people are making it out to be. It feels like there are really only two characters in the movie: the good guy, and the bad guy. Different actors have been assigned to one of these sides and then given random bits of dialogue to support it. However, the style of the dialogue is the same for both sides in that it’s stiff, choppy, and confusing. The result is that most of the movie feels like a schizophrenic argument between two personalities from the same brain.

Terrible.

The special effects

If the first trilogy was Audrey Hepburn (elegant, charming, and endearing), then this second one is Tammy-Faye Baker (bloated, overdone, and gaudy).

The special effects in the first trilogy were very well done, and I would argue that they hold up well even today.

The new CGI stuff is impressive, but the problem is that there’s just way too much of it. The human brain has short-term memory registers for 7 +/- 2 items. In the old trilogy, we were able to follow the excitement as three or four tie fighters chased after an x-wing. In the new trilogy, we’re lucky if we can focus our attention on one bloody pixel. Every scene has been made up to look like a cheap hooker after an all-night drinking and lipstick-smearing jag.

Rather than creating a thrill through all that’s happening on screen, attention is so divided that you wind up not being able to focus on anything, and so don’t care.

Another issue is that, in the old trilogy, the special effects stopped when we cut close to people who were actually acting. In the new series, the effects never stop, and they make the already confusing dialogue that much harder to follow. The actors are definitely playing second fiddle to the rendering engines.

I don’t know what George was thinking, but I imagine that it went something like this…


In the editing room: 

George: This scene’s coming along well, but I think we could add a few things.

Editor: [very tired] Add a few things? Like what?

George: Why don’t we put about six-hundred ewoks up along this ledge here…

Editor: But this is a Republic warship!

George: OK, so give them some bows and arrows or something. And make the arrows those kind with the suckers on the end – we don’t want anybody thinking ewoks kill things or whatever.

Editor: All right. I’ll stick your bloody ewoks in there.

George: And make one of them fart. That’s so funny.

Editor: If there’s six-hundred of them, then how will we know which one’s farting?

George: Zoom in on it.

Editor: But this is the scene where Anakin kills Captain Frooty Gunstabber! It’ll totally take away from the whole point!

George: Farting ewok!

Editor: C’mon, George-

George: FARTING EWOK!

Editor: Seriously-

George: FARTING EWOK! FARTING EWOK! FARTING EWOK!

Editor: OK, OK… [sighs] Farting ewok…


On the set:

George: OK - cut!

Actor: Cut? I was just practicing for when we actually do the scene. I didn’t know we were filming yet.

George: Good enough!

Actor: But I was reading from the script! It was in my hands the whole time!

George: Fine. We’ll Photoshop it out later. We’ll stick an ewok in there or something.

Actor: You can’t do that! It’s going to look like I have my hand up the ewok’s ass.

George: Good point. We’ll make it look surprised.


It’s just too much.

And, surprisingly, some of the effects are so bad that they pull you right out of the scene. When Palpatine is walking along some computer-generated “carpet”, for example, it’s hard to get into it because the effect is sloppy and it looks like he’s half-sliding, half-walking along. It’s like he’s supposed to be moonwalking, but we know damn well that he isn’t.

But this is a movie for kids – don’t you think you’re being too critical?

My dear, I am always too critical, and I’m not going to draw the line at a movie I’ve been waiting more than half my life for.

I’ve been hearing this lame “it’s a kid’s movie” argument since the “Phantom Menace” came along like a scourge of sci-fi dysentery in the late 90’s. I’ve been told that I’m old and cynical, and that, if I were a kid, I’d “get it”.

You know what I say? I say: bullhonky. That’s just crap.

Go back and watch the new trilogy again, and tell me what child is going to enjoy dialogue like this:

Senator Gooseface: ..but the Trade Federation’s consumer credit tax rating is stabilizing – we couldn’t possibly cash King Happyslap’s check without raising eyebrows (and horns and tentacles and other things) in the Republic’s central banking insurance rate adjustment facility.

Queen Strawberry: Nonsense. His payoff quotient for the year was 5.9, and that was on a low-risk investment platform meant to subsidize the Outer-Rim branch of the First Intergalactic Wookie Banking Consortium on Moonibus IX. If we pull out now, then we’ll never get his vote in the next monarchy election.

Senator Gooseface: M’lady! I beg of you – please consider what this will do to intra-stellar interest rates in the first quarter of the galactic financial year. This could spell doom for our home planet!

Queen Strawberry: Do as I say, Gooseface. I have plans to carry over our depreciated lightsabre tax into the forthcoming planetary spending audit. Cash King Happyslap’s check, and send him a carbon copy using an overnight Space-Mail envelope.

Senator Gooseface: [reluctantly] It shall be done, m’lady.

Queen Strawberry: One other thing, Gooseface…

Senator Gooseface: M’lady?

Queen Strawberry: Get it notarized. [dramatic music…]

This type of garbage makes up the bulk of the dialogue in all three movies.

And for those of you who still have a childlike outlook on life and enjoy this sort of youth-targeted dialogue, rest assured: there’s plenty of it in this installment of Star Wars.

Break it down and wrap it up, Rory…

Even though this episode of Star Wars sucks rancor-wang, it still has its redeeming points. The last half hour is actually pretty good, and almost makes you forget about the first ninety minutes – even the first two movies – hell, it even makes you forget about Jar-Jar.

So, let’s take a look at what was good, and what wasn’t.

The Good

R2–D2

One of the best characters in this movie. He’s not around a lot, but when he is, he’s a lot of fun. Part of the attraction is that he doesn’t speak at all – it’s just a bunch of bwooping – so George wasn’t able to make him into a putz like everybody else.

There’s also something really cool about this little blue-collar droid zooming around, taking out baddies, and helping to land gigantic crashing ships. He has an air of dignity that most characters in the film lack.

Yoda

Of all the speaking characters, Yoda comes out miles above the rest. Because he’s computer-generated, and therefore not a victim of George’s “let’s go with the first take” mental-illness, a lot of work went in to his expressions. It’s odd, but he comes off as being much more human than any of the humans in the film.

He also gets the best of the drama and the best of the comedy. His character elicits laughter, sympathy, concern, and excitement. This is something that no other character in the movie manages to do.

If the same care had been put into the other characters, then this might have been a good movie.

The last half hour

It’s obvious that much more care went into the last thirty minutes of this episode than into the whole of everything which preceded it (including the first two movies). I was impressed with the job that was done taking Anakin from good-guy to Darth Vader. I’m not going to say that it was a complex sort of fall, but it also wasn’t as predictable and lame as I expected it to be.

Like the rest of the movie, there are a few crappy bits at the end, but they occur with a much lower frequency. You’re more willing to forgive the lameness because most of what’s happening works.

And that’s it for the good.

The Bad

I have to be in Alaska around mid-June, so I’m not going to have time to write up everything that I thought was bad about the movie. Instead, I’ll just focus on a few key areas.

Untapped potential

What sucks most about this episode is that, unlike the other two of the new trilogy, it actually had a lot of potential. There were scenes which, if modified slightly, could have been good instead of disasters. It somehow hurts more to watch a scene that almost made it than it does to watch a scene that’s beyond help.

Choppy editing

The entire new trilogy suffers from Too Much. There’s just Too Much going on all the time, and the editing makes it difficult to sort out where we are, what planet we’re on, how much we had to drink last night, and what species this weird purple eyeball is that I woke up next to this morning.

The story is glossed over and it feels like George wanted to keep it to a minimum so that he would have more time to show off the landscapes. It just doesn’t work.

I can’t breathe in here!

There’s no atmosphere. The original trilogy was packed with the stuff. Hoth felt cold. Darth Vader felt evil. The cantina felt sleazy.

Here, we’re treated to many impressively rendered backdrops, but they don’t feel like anything. There’s no soul, damn it.

Two words

Palpatine asshead.

You’ll know what I’m talking about when it happens.

The comedy

There was real comedy in the film that worked in places.

Where the comedy didn’t work was where it wasn’t intended. Felix, Aydika, and I were laughing through a lot of the movie. Some scenes were just so bloody stupid that the only way to react was with laughter.

It seemed that about half the theater found these scenes funny, while the other half sat in stunned silence.

Nearly everything that was said by anybody in any scene

I know it’s been said, but the dialogue is just that bad. If the entire human race ran out of things to complain about, then at least we’d still have all the words from this movie to keep our negativity-machines running for the next thousand years or so.

It’s that bad.

My advice: pretend that the first ninety minutes of dialogue is in Basque, and that only three people on Earth could understand it. Anytime someone opens his/her/its mouth to say something, just think “LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA! I CAN’T HEAR YOU! LA LA LA LA LA LA LA!”

Then, at the ninety-first minute, start listening again.

You’ll thank me for this counsel later.

Darth Vader

Anakin’s fall is good. The rise of Darth Vader is bad.

The few bits of dialogue that everybody’s favorite galactic bastard gets are just retarded. So is the delivery.

So is what happens just after his lines.

I don’t want to spoil it for those of you who haven’t seen it, so I won’t go into detail. It’s enough to say that Darth’s first couple steps, along with the following vocal lamentation, are some of the worst few seconds of any film ever. George clearly wanted to do some kind of Frankenstein thing, but it comes off…

Uh…

Well…

All wrong. And that’s all I’m going to say about that.


Final thoughts

I feel like I’ve already said quite a bit. Although I could go on for the next few hours, I’m not going to.

This new trilogy is something that many of us have been waiting years to see. We’ve had a lot of time to build up our expectations, imagine new scenes in our heads, and prime our brains for an experience which would never happen.

The easiest way to summarize my feelings on this movie, and on the new trilogy as a whole, is with a line from T. S. Eliot’s “The Wasteland”:

“Well now that’s done, and I’m glad it’s over.”

Published Sunday, May 22, 2005 1:22 AM by Rory

Filed Under: ,

Comments

 

John said:

Rory, you know what to do.

Execute Order 66.
May 22, 2005 2:22 AM
 

Anonymous said:


Getting older, or?
May 22, 2005 7:55 AM
 

Rory said:

"Getting older, or?"

Or the movie just sucked.

There were plenty of 30, 40, and 50+ somethings who enjoyed the original trilogy when it first came out.
May 22, 2005 7:58 AM
 

Klok said:

Im going to see the movie today, and I sure hope I dont agree with you :)
May 22, 2005 9:11 AM
 

Hermann Klinke said:

Rory, I just love your writting style. But no I don't wanna watch the third movie anymore. Damn you!
May 22, 2005 9:43 AM
 

Domus said:

Aydika told you to say that.
May 22, 2005 12:17 PM
 

Buz said:

Thanks for dropping my expectations. There's nothing worse than going to a movie expecting greatness and being dissappointed ... like you were.
May 22, 2005 2:17 PM
 

Dare Obasanjo said:

Different strokes for different folks.

I thought that it was not only better than the other two prequel movies but also better than Return of the Jedi aka The Ewok Travesty.

There definitely was too much going in the space battle scenes though.
May 22, 2005 3:11 PM
 

Chris Sells said:

I liked it. It's now tied for my favorite w/ the original. When compared to episodes I and II, episode III is like that feeling you get after the stone passes and the pain is finally over.
May 22, 2005 3:14 PM
 

Mike said:

:'(

It's true, it's all true...
May 22, 2005 3:17 PM
 

Aydika said:

While I am in complete agreement with Rory's review, I will also say that I did enjoy *watching* the movie. Once.

Expect it to be terrible when you go (which I did) and you have some hope of having a good time. Expect to be impressed, exhilerated, and deeply moved anywhere other than your bowels, and you may find yourself sobbing into your beer afterwards.

It's fun to watch. But that's coming from someone who considers the original movies an element unto themselves, rather than something to be modified by the new movies.

My deepest disappointment is in George Lucas himself; I used to imagine he had creativity and taste. Creativity in terms of creatures and characters? Yes, I'll still give him that.

Given free reign, however, *this* is what he writes? I don't even know if one could call it "writing," as his new scripts seem merely to be a collaboration of all the cheesiest, overdone, overheard, sappy formulaic dribble from every movie, soap opera, and after-school special every produced.

But I still enjoyed watching it.

Once.

And I liked Obi-Wan.
May 22, 2005 4:52 PM
 

Ian said:

Rory -

"Actor: You can’t do that! It’s going to look like I have my hand up the ewok’s ass.

George: Good point. We’ll make it look surprised."

You need to send that to Lucas. THAT is good writing!

I laughed my ass right into my tea this morning. I'm off to make a fresh cup.
May 22, 2005 5:28 PM
 

Klok said:

Thanks for your review Rory.

I just read it aloud to my future wife, and we did agree with you on some of your points.

Most we agreed that too much was going on in the baground and it was hard to focus. The dialog as well, seems very technical, as you describe it.

But overall we were glad to see the movie, and we liked it. Thank you for lowering my expetations. Maby thats just what pushed me over to "the ligth side" :)
May 22, 2005 8:08 PM
 

Ventstation.com said:

It just needs a few more Ewok farts ...
May 22, 2005 8:53 PM
 

Shaz said:

Funny, Funny, Funny.... your just so funny!
Thanks for the review.
May 22, 2005 8:55 PM
 

mrpeabody said:

So Rory, can we have some ewok farts in the next Coderoom?
May 22, 2005 9:45 PM
 

Matthew W. Jackson said:

While I enjoyed the movie, I still cannot disagree with most of what you said (it *was* very busy).

But after reading many reviews, I feel like I'm the only person who ever saw Frankenstein.

Vader's rebirth was an excellent homage (except for the last line given by Jones, which *was* lame). You can't expect somebody to be able to move perfectly after getting all new parts, force-user or not. I'm surprised he didn't fall on his face.
May 23, 2005 4:33 AM
 

Andrew Gray said:

Rory, are you really coming to Alaska in mid-June? If you make it to Fairbanks, look me up, we'll show you around.
May 23, 2005 6:02 AM
 

Rory said:

Andrew -

Hey, mister :)

I'm going to be up, but only in Anchorage to give an MSDN Event.

How far is Fairbanks?

I'm guessing that it's about 5,000 miles away, but you never know (guess I could always whip out the atlas, but I've been out with Felix doing the karaoke thing, and I'm sleeeeeeeeepy now).
May 23, 2005 8:33 AM
 

Jon said:

Excellent article, Rory. Very rarely has an editorial ever made me laugh so hard and, at the same time, made me so depressed.

I have yet to see the movie, and I won't until it's released on DVD. I loved Star Wars for two decades, but that love was trampled on and kicked to the curb in May of '99. Since then, I no longer listen to my Star Wars soundtracks (at *all*) and only very, very rarely watch the original trilogy anymore (whereas I would watch it at least once a year prior).

Lucas is a sellout and a perfectionist, not an artist. I can't help but think that the whiny, tantrum-throwing Anakin is just a transposition of Lucas, himself, harboring a 30-year grudge against Hollywood and out to prove to the naysayers that he can actually direct.

Rory, thanks for the great laughs and for reminding me what made the original movies good. What you didn't hit upon, though, are covered in another "review" that I found. I think you'll enjoy it, if you haven't, already:

http://www.bynkii.com/archives/2005/05/i_hates_lucas_i.html
May 23, 2005 10:16 AM
 

Wojtek said:

Just to comment on "Creativity in terms of creatures and characters? Yes, I'll still give him that. "

Lucas doesn't design the creatures, or anything else himself. He has an army of people presenting him different designs, then he picks what he likes. While obviously it takes some taste to pick, I'd go as far as saying HE's been blessed to have worked with the people who made all these costumes, starships, everything that makes Star Wars as recognizable as it is.
May 23, 2005 12:04 PM
 

Charles said:

Rancor-wang. That make me chuckle.

Why was it that most people were expecting greatness from the 3rd movie? The 2nd one was bad enough although the clones were fairly good in battle. I also liked the fold-up rolling droids in the first one....

However, with Annie* being played by, for all intents and purposes, a piece of hardwood timber - I fail to see how the 3rd film could be anything other than a miserable failure. Would you use Robert De Nero as footings for a pergola? I thought not.

Never, ever use saw mill produce to create a focal point for the source of all evil. That's my advice.

Anyone, I'm just off to see Episode III - I hear it's really quite good.

*if only they had used the ginger girl from the film of the same name the film may have been a tad better
May 23, 2005 12:05 PM
 

Serge Wautier said:

c'mon Rory! I didn't plan to see it.

And now I don't want to miss the farting ewok looking surprised that an hand got lost in his ass !
May 23, 2005 2:45 PM
 

Leafbreeze said:

The great part about Ep.III was the music!! It should win an award for another John Williams masterpiece. It won't win anything else, but it will win an award for music.

Additionally, Lucas should have changed the title of this movie from "Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith" to "Star Wars: The Appology". This was the calibur of film the first two should have been. It does make up for the first two films, but its been a little late in coming.

Regardless, I'm standing by to spend $6 gazillon bucks on the 10-disk, 6-episode, 1-cartoon series, 3-making of DVD gift set with mail in collectors cup and light sabre pen offer!!! Yee-Hah!
May 23, 2005 3:35 PM
 

Anonymous said:

Rory, errr, it's about 360 miles. A little too far I'm afraid. Enjoy Anchorage. When is the event?

Andrew

-----------------------
Andrew -

Hey, mister :)

I'm going to be up, but only in Anchorage to give an MSDN Event.

How far is Fairbanks?

May 23, 2005 4:11 PM
 

Andrew Gray said:

Rory, errr, it's about 360 miles. A little too far I'm afraid. Enjoy Anchorage. When is the event?

Andrew

-----------------------
Andrew -

Hey, mister :)

I'm going to be up, but only in Anchorage to give an MSDN Event.

How far is Fairbanks?

May 23, 2005 4:11 PM
 

Badkaarma said:

Why would I want to listen to someone that admits he's too critical?
May 23, 2005 9:50 PM
 

Rory said:

Badkaarma -

"Why would I want to listen to someone that admits he's too critical?"

Because it's a nice counter-point to listening to someone who isn't critical enough. Read a few reviews to get a balanced viewpoint.

Anyway, many people are many things that they don't admit to being.

If I didn't *admit* that I'm too critical, then would you have felt any differently?

Anyway, it doesn't matter. I thought the movie stank, but most of the post is just me having fun with that. If you even considered taking it seriously, then that's really your own fault. When people are talking about ewok farts, it's usually an obvious sign that things shouldn't be taken seriously.
May 23, 2005 9:58 PM
 

Kevin Remde said:

Andrew,
He'll be up there for an event on June 20th. I know, 'cuz I'll be there, too. :)

Kevin - TechNet Presenter
May 23, 2005 10:02 PM
 

Kevin Remde said:

Ooop.. I mean June 15th. Not June 20th.
May 23, 2005 10:09 PM
 

Addy Santo said:

May 24, 2005 4:35 AM
 

Mark Miller said:

Rory,

Well you really had a different impression of the movie than I did. Of the films in the new trilogy I thought it was the best one. Yes it had its disappointments, and yes I think the new series is not as good as the first trilogy. I do buy the argument that your view of movies can change over time. I LOVED the first Star Wars movie from the first trilogy when I was a kid. I look at it now, and can remember why I was excited about it, but I can see now that it's a movie with a bad plot, and characters that aren't really fleshed out. I mean, in the first Star Wars, you could've deleted most of the movie and just shown the X-Wing attack on the Death Star and people would've flocked to have seen it. That was the reason the see it! All of this vague stuff about "the force" just left one feeling lost (until Empire Strikes Back), and okay, they rescue Leia, but what's the big deal there?

Incidently, Star Wars was the only movie of the first trilogy that Lucas directed. He directed all 3 of the new ones, and his influence is seen in all of them. I watched a documentary recently in which Harrison Ford aptly described him. He basically said that Lucas doesn't particularly care for actors going through a process of trying to "reach" the character. He just expects that since he wrote what he wanted into the script, that the actors should just "do it". Ford explained, "That's not how it works." I think that said it all. It definitely shows in the films Lucas directed.

I find that the movies, or art in general, that I admire the most are ones where you can tell that the artist is struggling, striving to express something in a way that hasn't been done before, having to compensate for the lack of technological development. In doing so they end up being ahead of their time. In contrast, it doesn't seem like Lucas really struggled or strived in his new movies. They're like a walk in the park in terms of effort. Not that they didn't spend a lot of time developing the scenes, but he got everything in that he wanted without having to compromise. The audience senses that too, I think, and so feels less impressed by the effort.

Rory, you may think that the old series' special effects look good even today (I do as well), but from what I've heard, the younger generation is spoiled by the modern effects. They look at the old movies and their FX and they look old, and rather rickety in comparison. Think of some old Sci-Fi movie effects from the 50s and 60s to get an idea of what I'm talking about for yourself.

I DO think that SW:Ep.I WAS a kid's movie! I don't see how one could look at it any other way, at least in it's "feel". Yes, there's the talk about the "medi-chlorines", and the politics of the Jedi council and such, but it wasn't that complicated, and it's about a kid, you know. And all of the characters are young and less mature, and Lucas stuck in a lot of characters that were just "cute".

Ep.II explained the start of the clone wars, but that was it. Just explaining. Not that exciting, though the battle between Yoda and Count Dooku WAS good!

Ep.III I think was good. I was a bit mystified by some things, but Lucas managed to put in enough comedy and/or action to make me not care. I understood why he put in a "separatist droid" character, but I didn't understand where it came from.

I agree that the "visit" to Chewbacca's home planet was a waste of time. He didn't do anything with it. It was just like, "Hi. Here's the wookies. Here's Chewbacca. Bye." If he was going to bring Chewbacca in, he should've talked about Han Solo, or at least his parents, or something. Incidentally, I was disappointed that they didn't get into Han Solo's story line at all. It's as if he never existed. There's enough material that hasn't been brought out there for a book to be written, at least, to bridge the gap in time from Ep.III to Ep.IV.

"The Seduction of Anakin" WAS good. I had a feeling the emperor would use Padme to get to Anakin, but he did it in a more clever way than I expected. There was a line that Anakin said that I almost laughed at. He said to Palpatine something like, "Are you trying to seduce me?" For a brief moment I had visions running through my head from The Graduate of Dustin Hoffman being seduced by Anne Bancroft, and I thought, "Oh geez George, you shouldn't have."

I had a different take on Anakin becoming the "man in the black suit". I thought it illustrated the point that both Padme, and her son Luke makes about him later: he does have some good in him. For a brief moment after he's taken off the platform, Vader shows some humanity, that he cares about something deep down inside. It was unexpected. We who have seen the first trilogy expect Vader to be totally focused on his goal of domination and suppression of the rebellion, and to kill whoever gets in his way. I don't blame Rory for feeling let down by this scene. It goes totally against type for Vader, but I found it rather touching.

There were some parts of the story that Lucas just rushed through.

An aspect of the "Jedi universe" that people have been wondering about gets explained a little bit: why the Jedi that get killed in the new trilogy don't "evaporate" the way Obi-Wan and Yoda do, and incidently, why after they're killed they don't reappear later in visions. They tie it all together very quickly at the end. It would've been nice to see that get fleshed out some more.

A piece of the story line that doesn't seem to get explained is how Leia has vague childhood memories of her mother, but Luke doesn't. You'll see what I mean if you go see it.

Luke and Leia are born at the end of the movie, and they briefly show what happens to them next, but not much.

The biggest disappointment for me was how they don't explain what happens to Padme. I thought it was a total letdown.

Ep.I & II were long movies, too long for some people's taste. Ep.III is rather short, just shy of 2 hours. It almost seems like it would've been a bit better movie had he taken time to put in some more. He gave some things short shrift in this one.

By the way, there's a HILARIOUS spoof on Ep.III at http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2663936, called "Star Wars Episode III: A Lost Hope".
May 25, 2005 1:49 AM
 

Anonymous said:

May 25, 2005 2:15 AM
 

Psybadek said:

acctually the movie was 2 hours and 15 minutes.. I timed it. :/
May 25, 2005 3:55 AM
 

Chris Jones said:

Couldn't really be arsed to read your review, but I did notice that a) you're a bloke, b) you refer to "when I was a wee lass".

"lass" means "little girl" ;)

(see http://www.answers.com/lass)
May 25, 2005 10:53 AM
 

Rory said:

Chris Jones -

"Couldn't really be arsed to read your review, but I did notice that a) you're a bloke, b) you refer to 'when I was a wee lass'. 'lass' means 'little girl' ;)"

I know.

If you had aresed on the arsing link, then you would have been taken to an arsing comic which explained why I referred to myself as an arsing "lass".
May 25, 2005 4:42 PM
 

Cameron said:

Lucas + Bad Darth Vader "Nooo!" = Mind bullets.
May 26, 2005 12:44 AM
 

Leon said:

I saw Ep 111, and although some sections felt fake and forced, I thouroughly enjoyed it. It si a fun movie to watch, although it is immensly dark. I would advise everyone to see it. I agree with Mark Miller's comments.
May 26, 2005 2:06 PM
 

Anonymous said:

May 26, 2005 4:31 PM
 

jiayuan said:

This is good news. It’s lamentable that we didn’t make this decision in time to actually get the anti-discrimination bill passed, but I’m sure the issue will come up again. And next time, Microsoft has committed to supporting it.
http://www.lingsheng888.com
May 26, 2005 5:46 PM
 

hansk said:

>> Darth’s first couple steps, along with the following vocal lamentation, are some of the worst few seconds of any film ever

I couldn't agree more. This was so pathetic I couldn't even burst out laughing, I was too shocked. Appalled maybe. It was bad.
May 30, 2005 10:16 AM
 

Anonymous said:

To everything having to do with "too much special effects": Hear Hear!! I especially like your comparison to Legos in the beginning - I feel much the same way about it.
--Deb (randomly linked here from somewhere else)
May 30, 2005 6:41 PM
 

Glenn said:

Rory, thank you for your review. Exactly how I feel. I watched the film and went home and cried over my star wars movies (original) and a cold beer.

I was stunned, floored, shocked and dismayed and that film. I went in with the lowest expectations i could muster, and damn, that's just cruel George, JUST CRUEL!!!

SURELY, SOMEONE in the process of making the film would have thought, "Shit, This is really bad" - How? I ask all of you, Could this have happened? What about the actors? Surely Natalie could see how crap hayden was acting - Why didn't SHE SAY ANYTHING?

I consider myself a CRAP AMATEUR ACTOR/WRITER - and it saddens me to think that some of my CRAP (trust me - CRAP!!) might have been better than that tripe. They should've just saved their time and sent me some money - i would've been more than happy to punch out some overused cliche'd Days of our DeathStar CRAP!!!
May 31, 2005 5:08 AM
 

anonymouse said:

Finally seen it. This review is spot on.

For my money, the most ludicrous bit:

Vader: "Where is Padme"

Emperor: "Oh, umm, erm, umm, ur, You killed her."

Vader: "Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo."
May 31, 2005 9:39 AM
 

PHIL THIS GUYS RITE said:

F***in shit. the worst bit was the NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO i agree thoroughly. i wanted to commit suicide and assasinate GEORGE 'DICK FUCK' Lucas after he directed this terd of a movie. absolutely truthful review, you saw through the glossed over crap and saw a bland pathetic story with the SHITTIEST acting ive ever seen, random and unrealistic battles(on lava WTF) and of course hayden chrisiansen, they must all DIE IN HELL. they even made ewan mcgregor bad and hes a good actor!!!! (trainspotting, muolin rouge of thats youre type of thing)
June 1, 2005 9:29 AM
 

Mark said:

Rory-

My feeling is that Episode IV was a fluke.

George Lucas hasn't directed a great movie since this was release. Episode V which is, to me, the best of all the movies was NOT directed by Lucas. For that matter neither was Episode VI.

If Lucas had wanted these movies to be as good as they could be he would have found a big movie director - one who can work with actors.

Just look at Lucas's credits since Episode IV "Howard the Duck" ... need I say more.
June 1, 2005 5:19 PM
 

Mark Miller said:

Re: "Just look at Lucas's credits since Episode IV "Howard the Duck" ... need I say more."

I had to do some digging, but yes, Lucas was the Executive Producer on that film. He had another real doozy before that, just after Star Wars had come out: The Star Wars Holiday Special.

Here's some of his better work:

- Raiders of the Lost Ark - writer, Executive Producer

- Star Wars: Empire Strikes Back - writer, Executive Producer

- Star Wars: Return of the Jedi - writer, Executive Producer, Music Producer

- Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom - writer

- Tucker: The Man and His Dream - Executive Producer
June 3, 2005 10:14 AM
 

Mark Miller said:

I reread your review, Rory, and thought of a few more things:

"There’s no atmosphere. The original trilogy was packed with the stuff. Hoth felt cold. Darth Vader felt evil. The cantina felt sleazy.

Here, we’re treated to many impressively rendered backdrops, but they don’t feel like anything. There’s no soul, damn it."

I totally agree with you on this. Everything did feel "distant" in the new trilogy. I do wonder though if part of it had to do with the CGI parts that Lucas put into them. I've listened to actors talk about what it's like to act in a scene where you're just talking to a ball in a room lined with green/blue walls. It's very challenging. Actors consider it ideal when they can actually be in a scene with the other character they're supposed to be interacting with. Watching the other actor's facial expressions, body language, and voice helps them out a lot in their performance. Given Lucas's tendency to not let the actors do what they do well, and I think that explains the result we got.

As for Yoda being more "human" than the human actors, all I could think of when you said that was the funeral scene in "Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan", where Kirk says of Spock something like, "Of all of the beings I have met in my travels, he was the most...", lower lip quivering, trying to not cry, "human!" (proceed with "Amazing Grace" on the bagpipes...)
June 4, 2005 12:20 AM
 

Anonymous said:

June 5, 2005 4:54 PM
 

Preston Page said:

Ok, so Sith was not a miracle. YET, I LIKED IT.

The family that watches Star Wars togehter stays togehter. SW is a family experience for me and my kids, their spouses, and the grandchildren.

Remember what Silverberg said to the New York Times Literary Review when they said, isn't 95% of science fiction shit? His answer, 95% of everything is shit.

But, it was still fun, still inspiring, and I will watch it many times. Oh, by the way, it is not part of the 95% that is shit, it is better than that.

So what if Lucas used Trantor as the model for his capital plantet, it is still most wonderful.

Preston Page
June 13, 2005 11:39 PM
 

Starwars Fan (Not George Lucas Fan) said:

Personally, I find it hard to beleive that we both watched the same movie. If you like to flame every BLEEPing movie that you watch, go watch one that actually sucked, like Bruce Almighty or The Wedding Crashers.
May Ewoks ass-rape you for your travesty to starwars.
In the words of a Character form Happy Gilmore,
"You suck! Ya jackass!"
January 10, 2006 5:47 PM
 

Rory said:

"Personally, I find it hard to beleive that we both watched the same movie."

Thank you for your comments.

However, I am better than you in every possible way, and my review is factually correct.

I'm sure you understand, then, why I won't be engaging you in a "My Death Star is bigger than *your* Death Star" argument.

It would be a waste of time, anyway - mine's bigger.
January 10, 2006 5:52 PM
 

TrackBack said:

Revenge of the Sith
May 23, 2005 3:28 AM
 

TrackBack said:

[OT] Birthday post
May 23, 2005 5:23 AM
 

TrackBack said:

Rory Blyth's Review of Star Wars Episode III
May 25, 2005 12:01 AM
 

TrackBack said:

Episode III
May 25, 2005 3:53 AM
 

TrackBack said:

Re: A Very Funny Star Wars Ep. 3 Review
May 25, 2005 6:57 AM
 

TrackBack said:

A must read whether you are a fan or not
May 25, 2005 3:36 PM
 

TrackBack said:

Episode III
May 27, 2005 2:25 AM
 

TrackBack said:

Episode *Yawn* Who Cares
June 1, 2005 4:12 AM
 

TrackBack said:

What have I been up to?
June 1, 2005 4:50 AM
 

TrackBack said:

praytothemachine » Revenge of the Sith review.
June 1, 2005 3:35 PM
 

Rhett said:

January 17, 2007 8:34 AM
New Comments to this post are disabled

About Rory

I *own* this site, you loser.