in Search
Welcome to Neopoleon - Sign in | Join | Help
Navigation: Home | Forums | Galleries

Ian supports the cause

Ian White, long-time friend and reader, just bought a .NET Rocks! sweatshirt. I wanted to give him a shout out because he's my friend, and also because he does nice stuff like this.

It also kind of sucks that he bought the sweatshirt, though. There's a different post on his site that I was going to link to, and now it's going to look like the only reason I'm linking to him is that he bought some stuff. That isn't the case, and I shouldn't need to say it, but I wanted to be clear.

So, the post I was going to link to was this one. Ian pointed to an article covering McDonald's discontinuation of the "Super Size" program. The motivation was, of course, to promote McDonalds as a healthier place to eat.

I've often wondered why the brains behind the golden arches haven't yet just tried to turn the restaurant into a fast health food eatery. Healthy food doesn't have to taste like crap. In fact, forget about "healthy" food - just give us healthier food. I, for example, have nothing against the idea of a soft drink with half as much sugar as they currently have. I realize that I might be alone in this, and that many people might find it disgusting, but I just don't need that much sugar in my food.

The only problem with a place like McDonalds switching to a healthy menu is the suspicion. It would be hard for us to get used to, and, like many other people on this planet, I'd have a hard time accepting the possibility that McDonalds would try to use anything but grease as a salad dressing.

Still, though, I think it could be done, and almost has to be done - both for good health and because people who are concerned about their health (which is more of us all the time) simply aren't going to buy a hamburger from McDonalds - even if it does only cost fifteen cents (or whatever they're down to now).

Published Thursday, March 04, 2004 5:40 AM by Rory

Filed Under:

Comments

 

Joe Duffy said:

The McDonald's brand is crap. If they want a new image, they should cut their losses [with the McDonald's brand] and spin off a new chain. Sure, they'll end up competing with themselves, but the fact is: somebody's going to do it, and the barriers to doing so surely must be lower for the team at McDonald's.

Very interesting.

BTW, small correction: they don't use pure grease for dressing. They add rat dung scraped off the kitchen floor as well, which helps to contribute to that slight tangy finish of their salad dressing. Perhaps your palate is not refined enough to identify such things... ;)

Uhh...
March 4, 2004 5:54 AM
 

Paolo said:

Actually McDonald's biggest asset is their property - they spend a great deal of time figuring out exactly where the most people want a cheeseburger.

Healthy choices are nice to have on the menu - especially when you are lugging the kids home and hour after the normal dinner time - and you just want to get them fed in the fastest way possible.

But when it comes down to it, when I'm in the mood for a BigMac - I want a BigMac and not some watered down BigMacLight or whatever. It's perfectly fine to eat foods that are not the best for you - just not for every meal. Moderation I think is the term - Everything in moderation.

Personally, however, I am glad to see the supersize go - actually I would just like to go somewhere and be able to order "small, medium or large" instead of "large, super big, and oh my god i'm going to drown in my drink"
March 4, 2004 8:21 AM
 

Jeremy Brayton said:

The only thing that has really changed is the name Super Size to large. Everything else is pretty much the same and they've only expanded the menu to include healthy crap.

Expansion of a menu is fine, but flat out removing something isn't unless it's beneficial to everyone. Some of us enjoy the mounds of grease McD's provides. If I want to be healthy I'll work out and cook my own damn food since I'll know what's in it. I take a risk when anyone else prepares my food because they can rub their ass on it, spit in it, etc and I would have no clue what in the hell happened to it. Hell I could think the extra 'care' makes it extra tasty.

I don't think McDonald's will ever be considered health food. It'll take our generation dying before that could ever happen because we'd all be telling our children "I remember when McDonalds was a grease pit that barely passed it's inspections, don't believe this health crap they're doing."

Also if I want less sugar, I order diet. I never do because when I want a soft drink I want it with full flavor. I can tell any diet drink over the regular because all of the artificial sugar tastes nasty. I'd rather be unhealthy from natural sugar than practically dead from manufacturered sugar (sorry I believe all artificial sugar is actually more harmful than good but that's just one of my conspiracy theories).
March 4, 2004 9:13 AM
 

Catatonic said:

Last year my best friend unwittingly bought a large drink at a movie theatre. Oh the look on his face when they gave him his bucket of Coke. He's probably still drinking it.

Supersize fries aren't bad if you split them with 2 or 3 friends instead of eating the whole thing yourself.
March 4, 2004 9:50 AM
 

Wolfgang said:

All of you Americans nagging about the big sized Super Size meals, I invite you all to come to the Netherlands. Our Super Sized value meal at the McDonald's consists of, yes, 500 ml of Coke (about 33 fl.oz., if I'm correct), and an amount of fries that's comparable.
I don't think it's necessary to change the McDonald's to McHealthy. Just educate people better. Make them understand the consequences of eating greasy hamburgers all day... Just like Paolo, I want to be able to enjoy some grease and red meat now and then. I mean, there is only so much steamed vegetables a person can have, y'know?
March 4, 2004 12:45 PM
 

invisible man said:

a good article on why mcdonald's food is unhealthy
(and a bunch of other stuff) can be found here:
http://www.gladwell.com/2001/2001_03_05_a_fries.htm
March 4, 2004 4:32 PM
 

Ken said:

It's all a conspiracy I tell ya. Fast food places like macdonald's makes you fat. You get fat. You buy diet supplements, you buy more bigger cloths, you buy other things because of your increase size. This is how the american economy works. If you don't know this then must have taken the blue pill.
March 4, 2004 4:52 PM
 

Rory said:

Ken -

"...then must have taken the blue pill."

Are diet pills the blue ones? I've been taking red and orange ones all morning, but I've kind of lost track of what they are.

Man. I love pills.
March 4, 2004 5:21 PM
 

Paolo said:

mmmmm pills...
March 4, 2004 5:38 PM
 

Dan F said:

I bet The Button Makers are climbing the walls over this one. Looks like Ken is onto them, but he hasn't made the logic leap from "you get fat" to "you need more of those cool cushion buttons in your coffin". Keep soldiering on young Ken, one day the full weight of the conspiracy will reach up and grab you like a fat man who thinks you are a donut.

Seriously though, have the maccas in the US introduced veggie burgers and salads? They've got them over here in oz, its kinda wrong to see salad at maccas. Pretty tasty though, a good alternative for the times you don't feel like grease.
March 4, 2004 10:29 PM
 

Catatonic said:

I tried a veggie burger at McDonald's ... it was the worst thing I ever swallowed. I would describe it as a mouth full of pepper with a hint of pork flavour. Didn't try the salad, but I've had a taco salad at Wendy's. It was more meaty & greasy than any of their hamburgers.
March 4, 2004 11:21 PM
 

Ms. Bitch said:

I'm with Mr. Jeremy Brayton on this one. When I'm in the mood for some shit food (or when I need to set the stage for alcoholic success by loading up before hitting the bars), I want McDonald's. (I don't think Rory will ever get over the fact that he once had to sit in the food court at Lloyd Center while I ate an entire meal right in front of his discriminating tastebuds.) I do agree, however, that if you're going to eat large amounts of fat and grease, it should be natural fat and grease. So I'd like to see McDonald's have a free-range meat on their menu that costs more than the regular, um, "stuff". I think it makes sense to have a few healthy options for people who get dragged to McDonald's, but in general McDonald's is what it is. It's one of the most repulsive American habits, but I kind of like it every now any then.
March 5, 2004 2:08 AM
 

Paolo said:

yeah the last thing we need is mcdonalds chopping down the rest of the rain forests to make room for the "free range" cattle. i think the sheer scale of the materials needed by mcdonalds prohibits a free range burger. i read somewhere that they don't have a blueberry shake because they would need more blueberries than there are in the world.
March 5, 2004 3:27 AM
 

Rory said:

Paolo -

"yeah the last thing we need is mcdonalds chopping down the rest of the rain forests to make room for the "free range" cattle"

Totally.

We should construct genetically enhanced cows in cube shapes for easy storage in large bins.

I like the idea of stacking cows.
March 5, 2004 3:32 AM
 

Paolo said:

mmmm cubed cow burgers :)

maybe it has already been done and that's why wendy's hamburgers are square
March 5, 2004 6:52 AM
 

Jeremy said:

Bonzai Cattle! The makers of Bonzai Kitten bring you the next innovation in meat consumption: Bonzai Cattle!

Place your baby calf in a bottle, like so. Watch your cattle grow into the shape of the bottle. When cattle has reached the correct consistency, slice and eat. Keep the bottle for easy storage and cleanup of leftover parts. Ground up any unwanted parts to feed to your other cattle through a tube. No waste, no fuss!

The next 20 callers will recieve their very own rope to tie multiple bottles together. Call now, supplies are limited.
March 5, 2004 8:30 AM
 

Eric Gunnerson said:

Rory,

The problem with McDonald serving healthier food is one of cost.

Beef, potatoes, oil, and soft drink syrup are all inexpensive items, easy to formulate, and fairly easy to prepare.

If you start moving to healthier options, you have to start spending more money on ingredients, and they're often a bit trickier to prepare well. Then, you actually have to have a clientelle who wants to buy what you have. Two words for you: McLean Deluxe

On the other hand, Subway has been making a lot of inroads on the healthy side, and you can argue that a place like Taco Del Mar has nutritional options if you leave out the sour cream and guacamole.

Interesting fact from an article - If you had a supersize big mac, you would in one meal consume more calories than you should have eaten for the entire day.
March 6, 2004 11:28 PM
 

KC Lemson said:

McDonald's meal salads they've had for a while are surprisingly good, and really pretty good for you. Of course there's always that temptation to answer yes to "Would you like fries with that?"...
March 7, 2004 12:15 AM
 

Julian said:

As a cyclist about London, I view the "golden arches" as a descriptive signpost indicating alternative public relief facilities to the lock'n'load Tardis-type toilets that have recently come to decorate our glorious capital. Maccy D - great place to get changed after a sweaty ride across town, great place for a "defuel" on the way back home from the pub. We're lovin' it...
March 8, 2004 1:37 PM
 

Fan said:

The was an article in the London Times on Tuesday saying there is more fat in a McDonald's Caesar salad. It is based on nutritional information from the McDonald’s website.

"A chicken Caesar salad with dressing and croutons contains 425 calories and 21.4g of fat, compared with 253 calories and 7.7g of fat in a standard hamburger. Add a portion of fries to your burger and the calorie count climbs to 459, but is still less fatty than the salad at 16.7g."

Source: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,171-1031425,00.html
March 12, 2004 1:03 PM
 

Aggie said:

Yeah I heard about that. That's just muessed up.
June 30, 2004 10:03 AM
New Comments to this post are disabled

About Rory

I *own* this site, you loser.