in Search
Welcome to Neopoleon - Sign in | Join | Help
Navigation: Home | Forums | Galleries

More east coast observations

Last time, I wrote about some general differences that I've noticed between life on the east and west coasts of these glorious United States of America.

This time, I'm going to drill down a bit and talk about the drivers out here.

My car finally arrived on Monday, and I've had a chance to experience the New England driver first-hand.

And I've lived to tell the tale...

Speeding

New Englanders speed.

Everywhere.

This is a good thing, and it's a bad thing.

It's nice because people in Portland ignore the posted speed limit and generally travel about ten miles an hour below the speed limit. When they're traveling in an area (such as a parking lot) that has a posted speed limit below ten miles an hour, say, five, they actually have to put their cars in reverse and drive backwards to make up for the difference.

Portland drivers are slow.

Get them on the freeway, and they will drive far below the speed limit in the so-called "fast" lane. They're bad people.

In New England, though, you get on the freeway and open the throttle until you're doing ninety. That's the rule. It doesn't matter if the posted speed limit is fifty-five, sixty, or sixty-five miles per hour - you go ninety.

The nice thing about this is that there is a much smaller incidence of irritating bastards camping in the fast lane to try and police all the speeders. Since nearly everyone speeds here, the self-appointed do-gooders of the world are greatly outnumbered.

So, that's the good. Traffic moves more quickly over here, and I've seen fewer traffic jams (even Boston in a snowstorm moved more quickly than Portland traffic at 5:00 PM).

The bad is that it never stops. Even a seasoned speeder such as myself knows that there's a time when the posted speed limit is what it is for a good reason.

For example, I always slow down around schools.

I realize that this puts me at greater risk of getting caught in the crossfire of a school shooting, or getting attacked by cannibal wee-ones whose minds have been warped by playing too many video games, but I still give them the benefit of the doubt and slow down so as not to accidentally run one of them over.

Out here, you'll have someone riding your ass and honking the horn non-stop if you try to pull something like that.

The posted speed limit might be twenty, but the "street" determined speed limit, the limit set by the people, is always ninety. Even around schools.

You can't even stop to drop your children off. You have to train them to tuck and roll out of the car at a high rate of speed. The de-facto speed limit doesn't slow down even for them.

The thing that's really shocked me is that the elderly are also in on it. In Portland, they cruise around town in their hulking Cadillacs at about three miles an hour, but over here it's like they're constantly trying to outrun the grim reaper, and I think they're succeeding. I've seen people who look like they're 110 years old, going just as many miles per hour down the highway, not stopping for anything.

It's completely cuckoo.

The lack of understanding

The speeding ties into another common theme in drivers around here: Impatience.

The impatience here is an art. Its penetration is complete and total. I think it's a defense mechanism for half the people, and a real way of life for the other half. In other words, if you yourself aren't totally impatient, then you're at the mercy of the people who are, so you adopt their habits to ensure your own safety on the road.

The classic thing that I've seen on the freeway is this:

Joe New Englander is driving down the freeway at ninety miles an hour. He sees a sign that says his exit is coming up in 1/2 mile. At ninety miles an hour, he's going to cover that distance in twenty seconds.

Well, he would cover that distance in ninety seconds, except that he's stuck behind someone who's only going eighty-five, and that's going to slow Joe New Englander's trip to the exit by 1.2 seconds, which is totally unacceptable.

What Joe New Englander does, then, is speed up to about two-hundred miles an hour to pass the person who's only going eighty-five, swerves out into the left lane, and then swerves back into the right lane ahead of the "slow" driver, and just in time to barely make it onto the exit without killing everybody in the immediate vicinity.

That's dumb. It's probably the most common maneuver that I've seen out here, too. It doesn't matter if it's an exit on the freeway or speeding up to a red light just to get there first. Impatience wears the pants in the family around here where driving is concerned.

Crashing

I think that some New Englanders are only vaguely aware as to what the use of the peddle just to the left of the gas might be.

Some of them might think it's for an ejector seat, while others might think it will cause an inflatable clown to pop out of the hood and wave back and forth in the wind to the tune of "The Entertainer."

Whatever they think it's for, some of them just won't use it.

Instead, then, the New Englander who doesn't know how to use brakes just scans the horizon for another car, a building, or perhaps a group of people to run into so that they can stop.

I woke up twice this morning to the sound of honking followed by the sound of crunching. It was probably just a couple families on their way to breakfast, running into the restaurant in order to stop, but it's hard to tell.

It happens so often, in fact, that I must assume it's intentional.

When I was much younger and learning how to ride a bike, that's actually how I stopped. My legs were too short to reach the peddles to brake (I got my speed up by starting at the top of a hill), so when I wanted to stop, I searched for the softest looking part of a nearby wall or tree to run into.

Maybe that's how these people learned to ride their bikes, and were never taught that this isn't how a good driver stops a car.

Who knows.

That's it

That's all for now. There's more to it, but I wouldn't want to bore you.

Published Saturday, March 20, 2004 6:11 PM by Rory

Filed Under:

Comments

 

phil said:

I have to say it ... you're in New London. That's almost NY to many New Englanders ;-)

Be aware of the following: New England is full of College towns. If you happen to drive the way that you've learned in the past week in a College town ... get ready to whip out the checkbook. Invariably it doesn't happen and you get the more Portland-like behavior. Also, when you encounter a college town there is the sudden behavior of pedestrians "ruling the road" despite the fact that it's meant for cars. If you're from outside the area, this can be very confusing because suddenly people do slow down, crosswalks are in fact crosswalks, people just suddenly appear in traffic lanes, school zones are just that.

Now the tricky part is there are no road signs warning you of this sudden "a little kindness won't kill you behavior". It may only be in a few neighborhoods of a city/town that it works this way ... but be prepared to surrender your license if you run afoul of the law.

Now for your next cultural enlightment ... indian (sorry, Native American) casinos. Not far from New London. Looking forward to the comics that'll be created as a result of visiting these temples of the modern connecticut economy.
March 20, 2004 7:12 PM
 

paul said:

New Jersey drivers will wave "thank-you" as they cut you off!
March 20, 2004 7:12 PM
 

Mark Freedman said:

I think we speed so often here (I live in NY, but work in CT) because we hate driving and want to get off the road as soon as possible. We wouldn't hate driving so much if it weren't for the maniacs on the road...who are the people who speed because they hate driving so much...because of the maniacs on the road...who are the people who speed because they hate driving so much...because of the maniacs on the road...
March 20, 2004 8:20 PM
 

Dave Rothgery said:

Pervasive speeding isn't just an east coast thing. I've noticed here in SoCal that we seem to believe speed limits are for other people (unless there's even a hint of rain). Certainly on I-5 or I-15 between San Diego and LA, it's not safe to go less than 85.
March 20, 2004 11:03 PM
 

Tim Scarfe said:

Rory,

I live in west London, and I read your comment:

"The nice thing about this is that there is a much smaller incidence of irritating bastards camping in the fast lane to try and police all the speeders."

Would never happen here! If someone was camping in the fast lane here I would be driving ON their bumber bombarding them with non-stop abuse!

Keeping them under as much pressure as possible, I would come up the left and then cut them up coming back in.

But no, you don't get that here :)
March 21, 2004 9:37 AM
 

Sean Cull said:

People in Vancouver seem to think that speed limit signs are only there to lend some degree of color to the otherwise dull gray pavement of the highways. Perhaps they think it's just more of a guide line than any actual laws being involved.
March 21, 2004 9:59 AM
 

Felix said:

this whole "slowing down around schools" thing will pass for you. It's just an unneeded relic of your rural roots.
March 21, 2004 10:50 AM
 

Sven Groot said:

I've been in the US once, in 1999, with my parents (and brother), and in Nevada my mom got a ticket for speeding in a school zone. ^_^

Here in the Netherlands you can't actually speed, because you're always in a traffic jam, or waiting for a traffic sign, or a railroad crossing, or a bridge, or some other obstacle.
On my drivers exam I actually was only driving for about 25 minutes of a 50 minute test, the rest of the time we were waiting for an open bridge and twice for a railroad crossing...

Although it's impossible to speed, everybody wants to, leading to people not keeping enough distance. And it's really disconcerting when driving a Ford Ka when there's a 10 ton truck not more than 50cm behind you. Luckily, since about a year now not keeping enough distance (with enough being defined as 2 seconds) is a traffic offense, so it happens less now.
March 21, 2004 6:40 PM
 

Josh said:

As you'll see from the comments (Vancouver, London, New Jersey, SoCal, etc), bad/aggressive driving is not unique to ANY geographical area. Everyone just thinks where they are is so much worse than everywhere else.
I moved from CT to Texas, and I couldn't believe how fast they drive here!
March 21, 2004 6:48 PM
 

Ben said:

The truly amazing thing I found when I moved to CT (from AA, MI) was the trend for the rate of traffic to be twice the posted speed limit. For example, there are sections of the Merritt (CT-15) and I-95 down near Greenwich where the posted limit is 40 or 45. Just before and after rush hour (6:30am - 7:00am and 7:30pm - 9pm) most everyone is going at least 80. It really just boggles my mind, coming from an area where you were worried about going more than 5 over.

That said, I've been out here four years now and I've gotten used to it. Now when I go back to MI, where the speed limit is 70 on some highways, I have this overwhelming urge to go 140.

The other thing you may notice is that everyone out here drives fairly nice cars. This has nothing to do with the amount of money people make. It has everything to do with survival. If you don't have a car that can do 0-75-0 in around 20 seconds, you will not survive, unless you have a Hummer, which is just as common.

You'll get used to being an asshole. Really.
March 21, 2004 7:21 PM
 

Matt said:

If you think traffic there is bad, try India... Very painful. No-one stays in their lanes, and everyone drives like a maniac. The max speed you can get to is about 50km, but you still take your life in your hands everytime you go out there. I've only been a passenger, and its bad enough.

I'm getting more blase about it now though. When the bus driver goes on the wrong side of the road around a blind corner in the mountains, and you see a truck coming the other way... well, i dont even blink anymore :)
March 22, 2004 4:12 AM
 

Mike Williams said:

The only thing that bugged me about drivers when I moved to Providence from Atlanta is what's called the RI Slide. In this situation, a car is wanting to turn left as you continue straight. The car will keep inching out more and more until you literally have to stop and let them go. It makes me mad to no end. Then they have the nerve to look at you like YOU'RE the idiot.
March 22, 2004 12:10 PM
 

Curt Koppang said:

Have you experienced the "Boston Left" yet?

You're the first car sitting at a traffic light waiting for the green. There is an oncomming car across from you signaling to make a left (to your right). The light turns green and the car turns across your path.

It's a classic. Welcome to the Right (as opposed to Left coast).
March 22, 2004 12:54 PM
 

erlybird said:

First, let me state for the record that I do speed. And also, I don't agree with anyone who would take things into their own hands and INSIST on driving at or below the speed limit in the left lane just to prove a point. With that said allow me to get serious here and state my opinion.

The word "limit" is unambiguous. It means "maximum" or "minimum" depending on the context. In the case of speed "limits" it means MAXIMUM!!! Therefore, each time a driver exceeds that limit it is THE SAME AS RUNNING A STOP SIGN. You are breaking the law when you do it. On the other hand...if you are driving in the left lane and NOT breaking the speed limit you are NOT BREAKING THE LAW!!! But in this debate it is THAT person who is made out to be the source of all the world's problems. This is WRONG!!! But the society of driving the WORLD over rejects this logical notion.

And finally the serious point. In order to drive as fast as possible, we in this country alone GIVE UP 40,000 lives each year. So, in return for the 1.2 second advantage over a half hour trip, which the typical driver considers a god-given right, we throw away the equivilent of 15 Sept 11s each year. If people would just CHILL OUT and RELAX that number might actually drop by half or more.

I do speed. I admit it. My wife drives the speed limit and at times it drives me crazy. But that is MY problem. I am a logical guy. And a massive loss of life affects me greatly. So, when I hear other speeders whining about the guy in the left hand lane who i ruining their day I have absolutely NO SYMPATHY. Being able to speed is NOT AN INALIENABLE RIGHT. It is against the law and the is no argument which can support it. Sorry folks.
March 22, 2004 1:47 PM
 

ozan said:

Rory,

What are those freeways you're talking about? Are they the same as the highways on the East coast? ;-)

March 22, 2004 3:35 PM
 

Dave said:

I live in north central CT, and often, when driving I-91, I encounter someone in the left lane going 55 in a 65. I swear, I can stay behind these people for 5 miles, and they never even pretend to have any intention to move over. So once I pass on the right, what happens? They speed up. God forbid I be able to go by. I just don't get it sometimes.
March 22, 2004 4:17 PM
 

Randy said:

He aint lying. Well except about the traffic jams, and that's cause he's in eastern CT :)
March 22, 2004 4:17 PM
 

Serge Wautier said:

Rory,

You're almost ready for driving yet a little more eastern : in Europe. When you come accross the pond, make sure to start driving in Northern Europe, then move slowly towards Southern Europe (such as Greece, Italy or Spain).

Germany will be a nice stop: They are very respectful of speed limits. But the trick is that on freeways, out of dangerous zones, there is simply no limit ! Assuming that 1. German don't drive slow because it makes sense but rather because there is a limit and 2. they have powerful engines, I can only advise to stay on the very right lane if you're driving _as slow as_ 90 (i.e. 145 km/h).

Heading South, you'll learn to use your horn : When there is an obstacle, rather than moving, just use the horn. Since there are loads of obstacles (using their respective horns), you'll end up driving with the horn keeped push all of the time. The rest is simply a question of mental superiority over the obstacle :-)
March 22, 2004 5:55 PM
 

John Stafford said:

The question isn't why New England is so fast, its why some places are so slow: http://stafford.typepad.com/the_next_america/2004/03/speeding_in_new.html
March 22, 2004 6:18 PM
 

Marco Nova said:

Now you're almost ready for drive in Italy. You still have to learn how to pass on the right and you'll be just fine. Hehehe
March 23, 2004 2:07 PM
 

Gee-Boise said:

In my opinion the worst places to drive are Tijuana and Salt Lake City. In Tijuana you find a big truck or an ambulance to run interference and stick with him. In SLC you just go...as fast as you possibly can...through the twists and turns of perpetual construction.
Now that I'm in Idaho it's very relaxing. They do have much more and longer road construction than any state in the union...they've been building an interchange by the mall (there's only one mall) for 10 years...not kidding...10 years...it's never going to be finished...we've come to accept that.
The freeway isn't bad, people go just a teeny bit above the speed limit and are generally courteous...of course it's 'cause we're scared of the cops. Most of them are from LA and wanted to go and work someplace where they wouldn't be hassled for a little creative agression. They'll shoot ya out here...and then have a party. Our state song is "I Got Shot by the Sheriff".
March 23, 2004 3:47 PM
 

Anonymous said:

portland drivers are the absolute worst!
February 28, 2006 9:51 AM
 

TrackBack said:

Rory Is the 21st Century Equivalent of Jean Shepard
March 21, 2004 9:55 PM
 

TrackBack said:

Take Outs for 21 March 2004.
March 22, 2004 12:24 AM
 

TrackBack said:

East Coast vs West Coast
March 22, 2004 4:30 PM
 

TrackBack said:

East Coast vs West Coast
March 22, 2004 4:30 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled

About Rory

I *own* this site, you loser.